Pick a film of your choice. Would you consider the female
lead to be a brave dame or a wimpette? Give your reasons. Please make specific
references to the article by Susan Isaacs and use 6 scenes to support your
feminist analysis.
Million Dollar Baby
The Million Dollar Baby is about a woman named Maggie
Fitzgerald played by Hillary Swank whose dream is to become a professional
boxer. From the beginning of the film, you can already conclude that she is a
brave dame with reference to Susan Isaac’s “Brave Dame Philosophy”. I believe
Maggie Fitzgerald fit in most characteristics of a brave dame. She fits in
article one, two, three and five.
According to Susan Isaacs’s “Brave Dame Philosophy”, article
one says that “A brave dame is passionate about something besides
passion”. Maggie Fitzgerald was
passionate about boxing. This was expressed somewhere in the beginning of the
movie where she waited for Frankie Dunn (Clint Eastwood) after a boxing match,
and asked him if he could train her. Frankie Dunn declined her offer stating
that he “doesn’t train girls” and that “girly tough ain’t enough”. This never
stopped Maggie from pursuing her dream of becoming a professional boxer. She
decided to join a boxing gym of which Frankie owns, to show him that she has
the potential to be a good boxer. Her determination and passion for boxing was
explicitly shown in the scene where she told Frankie “If I was thinking
straight, I’d go back home, find a used trailer, and buy a deep fryer and some
Oreos. Problem is, this is the only thing I feel good doing. If I am too old
for this then I got nothing”.
In article two of the “Brave Dame Philosophy”, it says that
“Even in the worst of times, a brave dame does not give up; she is resilient”.
According to Isaacs’s article “I am Woman, Hear me roar”, she states that “Yes,
their lives are sometimes tough- in the face of illness, death, economic
worries, family traumas- they show amazing resilience” (p.6). Despite the fact that she is facing troubles
in life- scrapping dishes and waitressing to help feed her and keep a roof
under her head and not earning enough, she was always determined in pushing
herself to do better. In Isaacs’s article “I am Woman, Hear me roar”, she said
that “The wimpette’s pain may be real, but she does little or nothing to avert
it. She can act, but chooses not to” (p.7). No matter how many times Frankie
tried to discourage Maggie to train in his gym, Maggie never gave up trying. In one scene, she woke up as early as 4:30 AM
just to go for a jog. Later on the movie, she was seen training late several
times all alone in the gym. Frankie finally then sees her potential and decides
to take her in and train her.
In article three of
the “Brave Dame Philosophy”, it says that “A brave dame is competent”. Maggie
was definitely competent as she was a quick learner and a good listener. Under
Frankie’s training, you can tell that she was getting better every day. Her
competence was later on proven when she was winning every boxing match,
knocking out every opponent in the first round. She climbed the ranks and made
it to the welterweight division in a short period of time.
In article five of
the “Brave Dame Philosophy”, it says that “A brave dame has high ethical
standards”. Maggie was shown to have
some ethical standards. This was shown more specifically in a scene where
Maggie and Frankie were having dinner, celebrating her victory over which she
knocked down her opponent and left her with some injuries that were quite
fatal. She was concerned about the condition of her opponent and said “Maybe I
should send her something?”. Her character was showing some sort of sympathy
towards her opponent which proves that Maggie has ethical standards.
In conclusion, Maggie in every way was portrayed as a brave
dame from the beginning to the end. It may seem that a brave dame is someone
who is perfect or flawless but they are not. Isaacs states that brave dames are
“pound for pound, they are heartier, more high-spirited, more valorous, and
infinitely less frivolous than so many wimpettes we see today in literature,
film and television” (p.6).